Hello Bill,
Hope you are doing great. It was nice seeing you are active in AMPP/NACE.
In terms of use of ER16.8.2, the filler wire is considered as a work horse for Hot side of Fluidized Catalytic Cracking (FCC), especially welding of 347 Hexmesh and other component of 304H metallurgy in the hot section of the unit (operating close to 1000 °F [~ 540 °C]). The lucrative metallurgical property, especially, resistance to sigma phase embrittlement and hot cracking make it preferred material for welding. Comparatively lower alloy content of 16-8-2 (to 316H or 308), makes it less susceptible to sigma (σ) phase, which enhance the creep ductility in such higher temperature environment. Also, the lower ferrite content makes it more resistance to solidification cracking (some time referred to as hot cracking). However, in terms of corrosion resistance, the performance of the 16-8-2 would be similar or say slightly inferior to the 308-filler rod/wire, due to lower total alloying content.
The acid gas SO2/SO3 are very corrosive above 1000 °F or above. In my experience at Sulfur recovery unit (Claus Process, ~1500 °F in incinerator components), the 304 and 310 were not lasting even one TA and ended up replacing 304H and 310 components to Inconel 601.
I can't see the pictures in this blog, however, summarize response to your question, I would suggest using the identical corrosion rate for 16-8-2 to 308 filler wire and if business justifiable, suggest upgrading to Alloy 601 (Inconel® 601).
------------------------------
Bhadresh Prajapati
Sr. Materials and Corrosion Engineer
Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, L.P.
Pasadena TX
+13462680230
------------------------------