Monitoring, Measuring, and Inspection

 View Only
last person joined: 3 days ago 

The Monitoring, Measuring, and Inspection Technical Community of Interest is a group of people (both AMPP members and nonmembers) who have come together for the purpose of furthering a common cause by sharing wisdom, knowledge, information, and/or data for disseminating information on testing and measurement procedures for corrosive environments or materials in contact with those environments.

Holiday Detection Methods for Conductive Coatings (Including Carbon-Fiber Reinforced Systems)

  • 1.  Holiday Detection Methods for Conductive Coatings (Including Carbon-Fiber Reinforced Systems)

    Posted 2 hours ago

    I'm looking for field experience with conductive coating systems and methods used to verify coating integrity and detect holidays.

    Traditional high-voltage holiday testing assumes a non-conductive coating over a conductive substrate. Conductive coating systems-including carbon-fiber reinforced coatings, conductive epoxies, static-dissipative coatings, and similar technologies-can complicate conventional holiday detection.

    For those who have worked with conductive coating systems:

    • What methods have you successfully used to verify coating integrity and detect holidays?
    • Which methods have proven reliable in actual field service?
    • Which methods have proven ineffective or produced false positives/false negatives?

    Methods I am aware of include:

    • Conductive backing layers
    • Conductive primers
    • Conductive meshes, veils, or scrims
    • Embedded metallic grids
    • Grounding through embedded steel
    • UV dye / fluorescent tracer systems
    • Modified spark testing arrangements
    • Alternative NDT methods
    • Manufacturer-specific procedures

    Questions:

    1. Which methods have you actually used in the field?
    2. Which methods provided the most reliable results?
    3. Were the methods manufacturer-specified or project-specific?
    4. Are there any applicable standards, technical papers, case studies, or manufacturer guidance documents?
    5. Have any of these methods been validated using known or intentionally created defects?
    6. If traditional holiday testing was not used, what alternative inspection methods were accepted by the owner, engineer, or manufacturer?

    Interested in hearing real-world experience, lessons learned, and any references related to inspection of conductive coating systems.



    ------------------------------
    Leroy Zogg
    Aquilla TX
    ------------------------------